Merge tag 'v3.9-rc5' into wq/for-3.10

Writeback conversion to workqueue will be based on top of wq/for-3.10
branch to take advantage of custom attrs and NUMA support for unbound
workqueues.  Mainline currently contains two commits which result in
non-trivial merge conflicts with wq/for-3.10 and because
block/for-3.10/core is based on v3.9-rc3 which contains one of the
conflicting commits, we need a pre-merge-window merge anyway.  Let's
pull v3.9-rc5 into wq/for-3.10 so that the block tree doesn't suffer
from workqueue merge conflicts.

The two conflicts and their resolutions:

* e68035fb65 ("workqueue: convert to idr_alloc()") in mainline changes
  worker_pool_assign_id() to use idr_alloc() instead of the old idr
  interface.  worker_pool_assign_id() goes through multiple locking
  changes in wq/for-3.10 causing the following conflict.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  do {
		  if (!idr_pre_get(&worker_pool_idr, GFP_KERNEL))
			  return -ENOMEM;
		  ret = idr_get_new(&worker_pool_idr, pool, &pool->id);
	  } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
  =======
	  mutex_lock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0)
		  pool->id = ret;
	  mutex_unlock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

	  return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
  }

  We want locking from the former and idr_alloc() usage from the
  latter, which can be combined to the following.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0) {
		  pool->id = ret;
		  return 0;
	  }
	  return ret;
   }

* eb2834285c ("workqueue: fix possible pool stall bug in
  wq_unbind_fn()") updated wq_unbind_fn() such that it has single
  larger for_each_std_worker_pool() loop instead of two separate loops
  with a schedule() call inbetween.  wq/for-3.10 renamed
  pool->assoc_mutex to pool->manager_mutex causing the following
  conflict (earlier function body and comments omitted for brevity).

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
  <<<<<<< HEAD
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
	  }
  =======
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

		  schedule();

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
  =======
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89
		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

  The resolution is mostly trivial.  We want the control flow of the
  latter with the rename of the former.

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);

		  schedule();

		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 11d01d67b3f5..6bbd90e1123c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 
 	/* If this is the first slave, then we need to set the master's hardware
 	 * address to be the same as the slave's. */
-	if (bond->dev_addr_from_first)
+	if (bond->slave_cnt == 0 && bond->dev_addr_from_first)
 		bond_set_dev_addr(bond->dev, slave_dev);
 
 	new_slave = kzalloc(sizeof(struct slave), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1746,6 +1746,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 
 	bond_compute_features(bond);
 
+	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
+
 	read_lock(&bond->lock);
 
 	new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies -
@@ -1798,8 +1800,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 		new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_DOWN ? "DOWN" :
 			(new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP ? "UP" : "BACK"));
 
-	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
-
 	if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && bond->params.primary[0]) {
 		/* if there is a primary slave, remember it */
 		if (strcmp(bond->params.primary, new_slave->dev->name) == 0) {
@@ -1964,7 +1964,6 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
 	}
 
 	block_netpoll_tx();
-	call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_RELEASE, bond_dev);
 	write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
 
 	slave = bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev);
@@ -2066,8 +2065,10 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
 	write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
 	unblock_netpoll_tx();
 
-	if (bond->slave_cnt == 0)
+	if (bond->slave_cnt == 0) {
 		call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEADDR, bond->dev);
+		call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_RELEASE, bond->dev);
+	}
 
 	bond_compute_features(bond);
 	if (!(bond_dev->features & NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED) &&
@@ -2373,8 +2374,6 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
 				bond_set_backup_slave(slave);
 			}
 
-			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
-
 			pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s, %u Mbps %s duplex.\n",
 				bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
 				slave->speed, slave->duplex ? "full" : "half");