diff options
author | Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> | 2020-07-09 01:19:09 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-07-20 13:28:15 -0400 |
commit | 30031b0ec8aef903ebede41f43a8d021f0030499 (patch) | |
tree | 38e042636b5c97028ff7746e68e48b64e8dc86d1 /security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | |
parent | aa0c0227d331719052cf14a3c10e99a12818d81b (diff) | |
download | linux-30031b0ec8aef903ebede41f43a8d021f0030499.tar.gz |
ima: Move comprehensive rule validation checks out of the token parser
Use ima_validate_rule(), at the end of the token parsing stage, to
verify combinations of actions, hooks, and flags. This is useful to
increase readability by consolidating such checks into a single function
and also because rule conditionals can be specified in arbitrary order
making it difficult to do comprehensive rule validation until the entire
rule has been parsed.
This allows for the check that ties together the "keyrings" conditional
with the KEY_CHECK function hook to be moved into the final rule
validation.
The modsig check no longer needs to compiled conditionally because the
token parser will ensure that modsig support is enabled before accepting
"imasig|modsig" appraise type values. The final rule validation will
ensure that appraise_type and appraise_flag options are only present in
appraise rules.
Finally, this allows for the check that ties together the "pcr"
conditional with the measure action to be moved into the final rule
validation.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c')
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 57 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 37438bffc62b..c679144af042 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -984,10 +984,27 @@ static void check_template_modsig(const struct ima_template_desc *template) static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) { - /* Ensure that the action is set */ + /* Ensure that the action is set and is compatible with the flags */ if (entry->action == UNKNOWN) return false; + if (entry->action != MEASURE && entry->flags & IMA_PCR) + return false; + + if (entry->action != APPRAISE && + entry->flags & (IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED | IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST)) + return false; + + /* + * The IMA_FUNC bit must be set if and only if there's a valid hook + * function specified, and vice versa. Enforcing this property allows + * for the NONE case below to validate a rule without an explicit hook + * function. + */ + if (((entry->flags & IMA_FUNC) && entry->func == NONE) || + (!(entry->flags & IMA_FUNC) && entry->func != NONE)) + return false; + /* * Ensure that the hook function is compatible with the other * components of the rule @@ -999,12 +1016,27 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) case BPRM_CHECK: case CREDS_CHECK: case POST_SETATTR: - case MODULE_CHECK: case FIRMWARE_CHECK: + case POLICY_CHECK: + if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK | IMA_FSMAGIC | + IMA_UID | IMA_FOWNER | IMA_FSUUID | + IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR | + IMA_FSNAME | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | + IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO)) + return false; + + break; + case MODULE_CHECK: case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK: case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK: - case POLICY_CHECK: - /* Validation of these hook functions is in ima_parse_rule() */ + if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK | IMA_FSMAGIC | + IMA_UID | IMA_FOWNER | IMA_FSUUID | + IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR | + IMA_FSNAME | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | + IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO | IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED | + IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST)) + return false; + break; case KEXEC_CMDLINE: if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE)) @@ -1218,7 +1250,6 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) keyrings_len = strlen(args[0].from) + 1; if ((entry->keyrings) || - (entry->func != KEY_CHECK) || (keyrings_len < 2)) { result = -EINVAL; break; @@ -1358,15 +1389,10 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE); break; case Opt_appraise_type: - if (entry->action != APPRAISE) { - result = -EINVAL; - break; - } - ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_type", args[0].from); if ((strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig")) == 0) entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED; - else if (ima_hook_supports_modsig(entry->func) && + else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG) && strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig|modsig") == 0) entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED; @@ -1374,11 +1400,6 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) result = -EINVAL; break; case Opt_appraise_flag: - if (entry->action != APPRAISE) { - result = -EINVAL; - break; - } - ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_flag", args[0].from); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG) && strstr(args[0].from, "blacklist")) @@ -1390,10 +1411,6 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO; break; case Opt_pcr: - if (entry->action != MEASURE) { - result = -EINVAL; - break; - } ima_log_string(ab, "pcr", args[0].from); result = kstrtoint(args[0].from, 10, &entry->pcr); |