From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/i8253.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/i8253.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c b/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c index 0efd36e483ab..64f6490740d7 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(i8253_lock); * to just read by itself. So use jiffies to emulate a free * running counter: */ -static cycle_t i8253_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 i8253_read(struct clocksource *cs) { static int old_count; static u32 old_jifs; @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static cycle_t i8253_read(struct clocksource *cs) count = (PIT_LATCH - 1) - count; - return (cycle_t)(jifs * PIT_LATCH) + count; + return (u64)(jifs * PIT_LATCH) + count; } static struct clocksource i8253_cs = { -- cgit