From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace/trace.c') diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 66f829c47bec..d7449783987a 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int __init set_tracepoint_printk(char *str) } __setup("tp_printk", set_tracepoint_printk); -unsigned long long ns2usecs(cycle_t nsec) +unsigned long long ns2usecs(u64 nsec) { nsec += 500; do_div(nsec, 1000); @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ int trace_pid_write(struct trace_pid_list *filtered_pids, return read; } -static cycle_t buffer_ftrace_now(struct trace_buffer *buf, int cpu) +static u64 buffer_ftrace_now(struct trace_buffer *buf, int cpu) { u64 ts; @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static cycle_t buffer_ftrace_now(struct trace_buffer *buf, int cpu) return ts; } -cycle_t ftrace_now(int cpu) +u64 ftrace_now(int cpu) { return buffer_ftrace_now(&global_trace.trace_buffer, cpu); } -- cgit