diff options
author | Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> | 2024-10-11 12:23:25 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> | 2024-10-11 12:23:25 -0600 |
commit | 47e544f576699ca4630e20448db6a05178960697 (patch) | |
tree | f31951120512ac41f145dc0fcf6b0bbdfe5b9c01 /board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile | |
parent | 5d899fc58c44fe5623e31524da2205d8597a53d1 (diff) | |
parent | 0220a68c25cbfdfa495927f83abf0b1d4ebd823b (diff) | |
download | u-boot-WIP/11Oct2024.tar.gz |
Merge patch series "Tidy up use of 'SPL' and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD"WIP/11Oct2024
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a
particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could
be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot,
with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL
Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular
phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases.
This has become confusing.
For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL'
phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL,
for example, must use something like this:
#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable
which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like
CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable
was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was
updated to support 'VPL_' as well.
This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the
above issues:
- The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build
- A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an
'xPL' build
- The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now
defined for TPL and VPL phases
- The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_
- The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_
It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of
the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty.
This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new
terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and
common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point.
The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there
are no code-size changes on any commit.
Diffstat (limited to 'board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile')
-rw-r--r-- | board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile b/board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile index 956ce8a90fa..283d3a4ae36 100644 --- a/board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile +++ b/board/renesas/ebisu/Makefile @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ # -ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD +ifdef CONFIG_XPL_BUILD obj-y := ../rcar-common/gen3-spl.o else obj-y := ../rcar-common/common.o |