From 6182495e101f2d3da29e632632c3d6e5035fef8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heinrich Schuchardt Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:33:55 +0200 Subject: efi_loader: need either ACPI table or device tree The EBBR specification prescribes that we should have either an ACPI table or a device tree but not both. Let us enforce this condition in the `bootefi` command. If the bootefi command is called without a device tree parameter use a previously device tree or fall back to the internal device tree. The fdt unit test should not be run on boards with an ACPI table. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- lib/efi_selftest/Makefile | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lib/efi_selftest/Makefile') diff --git a/lib/efi_selftest/Makefile b/lib/efi_selftest/Makefile index fb82e71976a..4945691e673 100644 --- a/lib/efi_selftest/Makefile +++ b/lib/efi_selftest/Makefile @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ efi_selftest_events.o \ efi_selftest_event_groups.o \ efi_selftest_exception.o \ efi_selftest_exitbootservices.o \ -efi_selftest_fdt.o \ efi_selftest_gop.o \ efi_selftest_loaded_image.o \ efi_selftest_manageprotocols.o \ -- cgit