conformance: fix confusion about legacy interface

The text describing the legacy interface also obliquely refers to a
non-transitional implementation. This seems to cause confusion
and there's no good reason to do it here: this section
is about legacy interface and transitional devices,
it add not value at all. Just drop it.

Note: the spec does not make it clear whether description of the legacy
interface is normative or not, and in particular, this section is not
linked to from any conformance targets.
Resolving that is left for later.

Fixes: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-167
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions