aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/extract_xc3028.pl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>2019-01-03 15:27:09 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2019-01-04 13:13:46 -0800
commit76699a67f3041ff4c7af6d6ee9be2bfbf1ffb671 (patch)
tree5d42b50be630e856b4e91c3109b56d8e4612a594 /scripts/extract_xc3028.pl
parent4e0982a00564c80cb849a892043450860ef91e14 (diff)
downloadlinux-76699a67f3041ff4c7af6d6ee9be2bfbf1ffb671.tar.gz
fs/epoll: drop ovflist branch prediction
The ep->ovflist is a secondary ready-list to temporarily store events that might occur when doing sproc without holding the ep->wq.lock. This accounts for every time we check for ready events and also send events back to userspace; both callbacks, particularly the latter because of copy_to_user, can account for a non-trivial time. As such, the unlikely() check to see if the pointer is being used, seems both misleading and sub-optimal. In fact, we go to an awful lot of trouble to sync both lists, and populating the ovflist is far from an uncommon scenario. For example, profiling a concurrent epoll_wait(2) benchmark, with CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES shows that for a two threads a 33% incorrect rate was seen; and when incrementally increasing the number of epoll instances (which is used, for example for multiple queuing load balancing models), up to a 90% incorrect rate was seen. Similarly, by deleting the prediction, 3% throughput boost was seen across incremental threads. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108051006.18751-4-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/extract_xc3028.pl')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions